Pages

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Why the GMO issue is hurting America

I am observing tremendous amounts of time end energy being put into the opposition of genetically modified organism in the United States, and I am worried that these costs are crippling progress on environmental health and wellness in several ways:

  1. Politically, Democrats who typically support environmental and health legislation are being put on the defense on this issue.  Some are arguing that environmentalists should withhold support from Democrats who do not seem to line up with the GMO-free camp.  As an example, simply Google 'Obama and Monsanto Protection Act.'  Be prepared to find a slew of attack articles, such as this one from Alex Jones' InfoWars site:  http://www.infowars.com/top-10-excuses-for-obama-signing-the-monsanto-protection-act/
  2. Much of the information about GMO dangers is low-quality, and is undermining the credibility of the issue and people who are concerned about the issue.  Take the example of Anthony Gucciardi of the Natural News, Natural Society, and Real Farmacy websites.  His own biography states that he has worked with InfoWars and the Drudge Report.  There is a good overview of his approach to GMO journalism here:  http://theprogessivecontrarian.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/anthony-gucciardi-anti-science-crackpot-and-pretend-journalist/
  3. We already have a GMO-free label: USDA Certified Organic.  The reason why the FDA opposes the use of the words GMO-free is that it is impossible to certify this in our food systems.  GMO contamination at trace levels is common. (Source: http://goo.gl/OuNRf)
  4. There are no proven health effects of GMO, yet activists opposed to GMO continue to argue of illnesses including cancer.  These health concerns are resulting in consumers choosing to avoid GMO food, instead buying only organic foods even if it reduces their food budget or is not as nutritious as conventional food. (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies#Health and http://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/organic-food-no-more-nutritious-than-conventionally-grown-food-201209055264)
  5. Organic food is popular and growing, regardless of GMO labeling.  From 1990 to 2010, the organic market grew from $1 Billion to over $26 Billion in the United States, including an almost 10% increase from 2009 to 2010.  Organic products from the United States account for 80% of the $50 Billion worldwide market. (Source: http://www.ota.com/organic/mt/business.html)
  6. Creating a duplicate labeling system for 'bad' foods, or foods containing GMO, sets up regulators to receive a barrage of lawsuits from companies that have to carry this label.  In fact, it is unrealistic that forcing companies to label their products as containing GMO will ever be something that would make it through the courts - even if the law requires it.  This is exactly why I believe Prop 37 was defeated in California, not simply because opponents outspent supporters by several million dollars.
The bottom line for me is that we need to educate ourselves, but not at the expense of sacrificing scientific standards and literacy.  We need to encourage organic food production and consumption, but not at the cost of nutrition and alienating potential partners and stakeholders.  We need to stop vilifying people who are trying to share some common sense on this issue.  We need to focus on the rational, debatable side of the issue and not on the polarizing, negative, and emotional side.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Jimmy Carter speaks out on marijuana legalization

I was pleased to read that Jimmy Carter is promoting a nuanced view when it comes to marijuana use.

He is:

  • Pro-decriminalization
  • Anti-legalization

In addition, if it is not clear, he doesn't believe there should be advertising for marijuana and that we should not allow driving under the influence of it.  Also, he supports avoiding using the drug entirely, especially among young people.

Good points, I think.

Link: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/jimmy-carter-marijuana-legalization-91561.html

New documentary on mindfulness education and research

This new documentary, Free the Mind, looks really interesting.  And not just because it focuses on some of the work being done at my alma mater and current workplace.  I can't wait to see it!

Link: http://www.news.wisc.edu/21781

Experts including the Dalai Lama convened recently in Madison to discuss the issues of wellbeing

I really enjoyed listening to the Dalai Lama and several other experts on health and wellbeing share their perspectives and advice during the recent 'Change your Mind, Change the World' event held here in Madison on Wednesday, May 17th.  The bottom line of the sessions was that we need to devote more on a personal and community level toward emotional health through interventions such as mediation and more attention to substance abuse and mental health resources and services.  You can watch the public sessions from the Overture Center on Wednesday online via Wisconsin Public Television.

Link:  http://host.madison.com/news/local/dalai-lama-other-leading-thinkers-say-emotional-health-key-to/article_3611133a-9f24-5283-9ffd-5c6ce0778952.html


Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Major U.S. panel finds no evidence for limited salt intake

An expert committee put together by the U.S. Institute of Medicine and commissioned by the Centers for Disease Control has found there to be no evidence suggesting that individuals will benefit from restricting their sodium intake to 1,500 milligrams per day.  Previous guidelines, including the recommended daily dietary intake of between 1,500 to 2,300 milligrams, have been found to exist without justification.

While not a part of the study, it is known that the risk of heart attack and stroke can be significantly reduced by other means, such as by eating less meat and by exercising more.

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/15/health/panel-finds-no-benefit-in-sharply-restricting-sodium.html

U.S. National Transportation Safety Board proposal to reduce legal driving blood content to .05%

This seems like a wonderful idea to further reduce the number of fatalities and injuries which occur in the U.S. related to drinking and driving - currently that figure is over 10,000 deaths per year.  Automobile deaths of children age 14 and younger were caused by a drunk driver 17% of the time.

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/15/us/legal-limit-drunken-driving-safety-board.html and http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html

Friday, May 10, 2013

CO2 levels highest in human history; average daily level in atmosphere exceeds 400 ppm

Congrats, humans.  You are well on your way to destroying life on earth as we know it!  Groups like 350.org are trying to reverse the alarming trend of climate change... it may not be too late to do something about it.

Link:  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Wisconsin #GOP proposal to ban the banning of sugary drinks moves ahead

Ain't no city in Wisconsin gonna ban any sugary drinks anytime soon.  Our state's Republican legislators are looking out for us, and spending their time wisely.

Link: http://www.channel3000.com/health/sugary-drinks-bans-banned-statewide/-/1652/20082736/-/ripbpiz/-/index.html

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Wisconsin outnumbers nearly all other states in # of bars and bars per capita

Despite having a quarter of the population of New York and one seventh the population of California, Wisconsin has nearly as many bars as each of those states.  The states which are closest to Wisconsin's population have at most two thirds fewer bars and taverns.

Link:  http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/data-only-states-have-more-bars-than-wisconsin/html_1a7a0e58-b732-11e2-99a0-001a4bcf887a.html

Wisconsin #GOP targets poor with zero evidence about nutrition and food stamps

Food stamps and entitlements are only the second thing that Republicans seem to care about, next to taxes.  But why?

Do they really think that abuse of programs like WIC and Foodshare are making people poor and/or unhealthy?  Or are they just upset that taxes are too high and/or could be spent on other things?

I venture to guess it's because they don't know why people are poor and/or unhealthy, and that it is easier for them to blame poor people themselves than to actually study or understand the complex issues that Foodshare recipients actually face.

In fact, we already know that most Foodshare beneficiaries are short-term recipients due to a job loss, family illness, or other temporary problem.  Many others simply cannot earn enough to be able to feed their kids without help.

Perhaps there are abuses, but there has never been any study of how much of a problem it is.  Somehow, the anecdotal stories that make the news take the place of we don't know for certain.

Frankly, I blame racism for a lot of this.  While whites are the overwhelming majority of Foodshare benefits, there are higher percentages of people receiving this aid within the African American and Latino communities.

We don't seem to have a problem with millions in government subsidies that go to white dairy farmers or others in the agricultural sector, but you hear one story about an African American man who used food stamps to buy a lobster and suddenly there is a major scandal.  How is that fair?

Oh yes, because the white farmer is employed.  I venture to guess, however, that he might be on Foodshare himself if not for the subsidies that are out there.

Please, people, think things through a little bit more.  People do not eat better when they are poor.  They eat worse.  If we are concerned about improving health for our most vulnerable citizens, let's take a more balanced approach and look at the entire environment and increase some actual opportunities rather than take away what little people have to start with.

Link: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/odd-coalition-opposes-wisconsin-bill-limiting-junk-food-purchases-qu9re45-206318501.html